Since I started my
first day at Rönninge elementary school have I come in contact with both
qualitative and quantitative methods many times. Even though I did not
understand the exact meaning of the two terms to the fullest have I at least used
some of the different methods many times. I have done all from interviews with teachers
about their thoughts on grading to oral surveys with my fellow classmates about
the bad meals in school. It was not until my years in the academic circle at
KTH I fully understood what quantitative and qualitative methods actually
contributes to in an academic paper.
During my bachelor
thesis in the spring of 2012 did my knowledge on quantitative and qualitative
methods really came to a test, when I actually had to define what the two terms
meant and make an active choice of what methods to include. When reflecting on
my work today, after getting more understanding of the two terms and after
reading many more academic papers compared to 2012, can I admit that I did not fully
understand what I was doing. I more or less took all “popular” qualitative and
quantitative methods and mixed them up while indirect motivating my behaviour
with: “the more the merrier”. Hence this course fits perfectly in my schedule, it
is the period just before I am going to write my master thesis.
One thing I have
reflected much on this past week is which of the two methodologies of
collecting data I believe to be the best. On one hand can the quantitative data
be much better because it will give the paper a broader understanding, since
many more opinions can be involved, My selected paper for this week had for
example almost half a million different inputs, therefore is it impossible to
ignore what is being stated. What the quantitative data gain in the amount of
different opinions, it lacks in quality of whom the opinions comes from. A
comment and an estimation on the future of the Swedish economy will for example
be much more trustworthy if it comes from a professor from a Swedish University
rather than a thousands kinder garden teachers. In that sentence can the
qualitative methods be much better fitted than the quantitative since it
provides a deeper understanding to the paper.
It will be extremely interesting to see how I will construct my master thesis after Christmas, will I make the same mistake of just adding all methods in a foggy mix or will I take decisions based on academic thoughts? I believe that this week’s subject has not only made me gain more knowledge of how to collect empirical data, it has also made me reflect deeper on why we collect data, and to what purpose.
It will be extremely interesting to see how I will construct my master thesis after Christmas, will I make the same mistake of just adding all methods in a foggy mix or will I take decisions based on academic thoughts? I believe that this week’s subject has not only made me gain more knowledge of how to collect empirical data, it has also made me reflect deeper on why we collect data, and to what purpose.
Hej Adam. First of all I wish you good look for your master's thesis! Just a few months ago I finished my bachelor's thesis and can absolutely understand how it is confusing and frustrating to be pressured to generate "relevant" information by research. Therefore it is so important that you clearly define prior what your bigger research question is, i.e. your goal what you want to know. In the beginning of my thesis I had a clear assumption of what I wanted my results to be, by taking less time and effort into deeper reflect on "why" I was conducting the survey. I'm glad that I had a patient and great supervisor who explained to me the importance of why we do research. I could only start with my study when I had a clear outline why I was doing this. The answer to the question "how" I should collect the information was then pretty self-explaining. I hope you don't make the same mistake again ;)
SvaraRadera